Redevelopment & Encroachment
How a Known Burial Ground Became Vulnerable
Embedded Files
From Community to "Redevelopment Zone"
By the mid-20th century, Brutontown—like many historic Black communities across the South—faced increasing pressure from public and private redevelopment initiatives. As Greenville County expanded infrastructure, housing, and public facilities, areas historically occupied by African American communities were frequently reclassified as underutilized or blighted, making them targets for intervention.
These shifts did not occur in isolation. They reflected broader regional and national redevelopment frameworks that often prioritized land reuse and economic development over cultural continuity and burial ground protection—particularly where African American cemeteries were concerned.
A Landscape Repeatedly Target for Redevelopment (1970s-2010s)
Beginning in the 1970s, the Brutontown area was repeatedly included in redevelopment planning efforts administered by the Greenville County Redevelopment Authority (GCRA) and related county and federal programs.
Across multiple decades, these efforts included:
Area studies and redevelopment planning initiatives
Public notices and grant-funded projects
Construction and land modification activities within or adjacent to the historic Brutontown footprint
While redevelopment projects varied in scope and purpose, the cumulative effect was consistent: incremental encroachment into a landscape that included known historical burial grounds.
Notably, these efforts unfolded without comprehensive burial surveys, formal cemetery boundary designations, or sustained consultation with known descendants—conditions that significantly increased the risk of disturbance to ancestral graves.
The Mid-2000s Recreation Facility: Development Within a
Burial Corridor
Between 2004 and 2008, a publicly supported recreation and community facility was constructed within the historically recognized Brutontown area. The facility was built on a parcel situated directly between two known African American cemeteries — Brutontown Cemetery and Walcott Cemetery — along Leo Lewis Street.
Community memory, family histories, and descendant accounts consistently place burials within and across this area, long understood as part of a continuous burial landscape associated with Society Ground.
A Burial Corridor, Not an Isolated Parcel
Key Fact: The community center parcel sits directly between African American burial grounds—Walcott & Brutontown Cemeteries—both historically owned and stewarded by Society Ground.
GIS mapping and parcel records show that:
Brutontown Cemetery lies immediately south of the facility
Walcott Cemetery lies immediately north of the facility
The recreation center occupies the parcel between these two burial grounds
Greenville County land records identify Society Ground as the recorded owner associated with both the Walcott Cemetery and the Brutontown Cemetery parcels, reinforcing their historical continuity and shared function as African American burial grounds serving the Brutontown community.
Absence of Documented Safeguards
To date, no publicly available records have been identified demonstrating that prior to construction:
A burial disinterment process was conducted
Descendants were formally consulted
A cultural, archaeological, or burial survey preceded development
The absence of such documentation raises unresolved questions regarding how burial protections were evaluated and how ancestral remains were considered during the planning and construction process.
Figure: Greenville County GIS map showing the spatial relationship between Walcott Cemetery, the Brutontown Community Center parcel, and Brutontown Cemetery. The community center parcel is situated directly between two historically documented African American burial grounds associated with Society Ground.
The 2009 Historical Marker: Formal Recognition without Enforceable Protection
In 2009, the Greenville County Redevelopment Authority (GCRA) erected a South Carolina historical marker identifying Brutontown and explicitly referencing the three-acre "Society Burial Ground" on Leo Lewis Street, noting that it dates from before the Civil War and includes the graves of enslaved people, free Black individuals, and freedmen.
The marker formally acknowledged the historical and cultural significance of Society Ground, even as development activity had already altered the surrounding burial landscape.
This sequence—construction first, recognition later—underscores a central tension in the Brutontown story: historical acknowledgement without corresponding preservation safeguards.
A Turning Point in the Brutontown Narrative
The mid-2000s development represents a decisive moment in the history of Brutontown. It reflects a shift from incremental encroachment to physical alteration within a documented burial landscape, raising enduring questions about stewardship, responsibility, and the treatment of African American burial grounds amid redevelopment.
These questions remain unresolved.
They now form the foundation for descendant inquiry, documentation, and preservation efforts moving forward.
Activation Through Discovery
The discovery of active desecration in 2025 did not create the issue—it revealed it. What began as a response to a present-day violation expanded into a reckoning with decades of redevelopment decisions that had gone unexamined, unchallenged, and undocumented.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse